Surface Roughness Converter (Ra ↔ RMS ↔ N-Grade)
Convert arithmetic average roughness (Ra) to RMS (Rq) and the nearest ISO 1302 roughness grade number (N1–N12).
Surface Roughness Converter
Converts arithmetic average roughness (Ra) to RMS (Rq) and the nearest ISO 1302 roughness grade number (N1–N12).
Assumptions & Limitations
- The 1.11× ratio is exact only for an idealized sine-wave profile — ground, turned and milled surfaces each have different real Ra:RMS ratios, typically in the 1.0–1.3× range.
- N-grade is reported as the single nearest standard value, not an interpolated in-between figure.
- Does not account for waviness or lay direction, both of which affect functional surface performance independent of Ra/RMS.
Reference: Full ISO 1302 Roughness Grade Table
Precomputed values from the exact formula used above — useful as a quick lookup without re-entering inputs.
| Grade | Ra (μm) | Ra (μin) | Typical Process |
|---|---|---|---|
| N4 | 0.2 | 7.9 | Lapping, honing, superfinishing |
| N5 | 0.4 | 15.7 | Grinding, honing |
| N6 | 0.8 | 31.5 | Grinding |
| N7 (calculator default) | 1.6 | 63.0 | Precision turning, grinding |
| N8 | 3.2 | 126.0 | Turning, milling |
| N9 | 6.3 | 248.0 | Rough turning, milling |
| N10 | 12.5 | 492.0 | Rough machining, sawing |
Process associations are typical/approximate ranges commonly cited in machining references — actual Ra achieved depends heavily on tooling, feed rate and material.
Reading a 1.6 μm Ra Drawing Callout
A rod end bore drawing calls out 1.6 μm Ra on the bearing seat. What does that mean in RMS and ISO grade terms, and is it achievable by standard turning?
- RMS ≈ 1.11 × 1.6 = 1.776 μm (sinusoidal-profile approximation).
- 1.6 μm Ra ≈ 63 μin Ra — matches the commonly seen “63 RMS” callout on US-drawing legacy prints (loosely; many older prints label Ra as “RMS” even though they’re numerically close but not the same quantity).
- Nearest ISO grade: N7, typically associated with precision turning or grinding.
- Standard turning alone often lands in the N7–N9 range depending on feed and tooling — 1.6 μm Ra is achievable but toward the finer end; verify with your machinist’s actual process capability.
Related reading: Metallurgy & Quality Control →